Hi, In the gateway case, can't you use the Reason header to provide additional information? Regards, Christer > -----Original Message----- > From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx > [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dale Worley > Sent: 17. maaliskuuta 2009 0:29 > To: Dean Willis > Cc: SIPPING > Subject: Re: Supporting Multiple Path Routing > > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:23 -0600, Dean Willis wrote: > > The problem is either that you're not getting a sufficiently > > descriptive response back from the first gateway so that you can > > decide whether or not to try the second gateway, or that the proxy > > isn't smart enough to tell the difference. > > Yes, in the basic case, the problem is that we're not getting > a sufficiently descriptive response back from the gateway. > In the -00 version of the draft, I went through all the > response codes, and there are 6 whose definition are > insufficiently explicit to be troublesome. > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP > Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current > sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP > _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
