Re: Supporting Multiple Path Routing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hisham Khartabil
> Sent: 17 March 2009 04:29
> To: Scott Lawrence
> Cc: SIPPING
> Subject: Re:  Supporting Multiple Path Routing

....
 
> > Granted that not all intermediate systems can know for every request
> > whether what they are returning is an end-to-end response or an
> > intermediate-to-end response.  But sometimes they do, and 
> when they do
> > they should be clearer about it than we find them to be today (some
> > gateways return 486 when they are out of local DSP 
> resources and have
> > not attempted a PSTN call at all, for example).
> 
> I would think this should return a 5xx response (503 to be precise).
> Aren't those things usually configurable in a GW?
[JRE] And for a QSIG gateway 503 is indeed specified in RFC 4497, and likewise in RFC 3398 for ISUP.

John

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux