On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On 04/23/2016 02:04 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > > The fallback user is used in all the write functions, making it use a > > struct allows us to have everything consistent between normal and > > fallback users. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Zaman <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > When you split a patch into a series, the goal is to ensure that the > code remains in a working state after each patch in the series. > Otherwise, git bisect will often find broken states in the future. > So, we have two options: > 1. You can refactor this patch set so that it does compile after each > patch (currently breaks on this one at least). > 2. I can squash them all into one logical change. The best is squashing 2-4 into one then. The others are pretty self contained. 2-4 was a really big change so I split it up even tho it broke the build but if you'd prefer squashing them thats not a problem. -- Jason _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
