Re: SELinux performance depending on type count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 20:46 +0200, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 19:00 +0200, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> > > I don't have an auditd, not running mcstransd and also had 
> > > disabled restorecond.
> > > 
> > > I take it, /sys/fs/selinux is equivalent to /selinux?
> > 
> > Yes.  /selinux moved to /sys/fs/selinux in more modern distro versions.
> > 
> > > /sys/fs/selinux is empty on both my Ubuntu systems.
> > > 
> > > /selinux/policyver in 26 as is the suffix of the policy file.
> > > 
> > > Complete policy is attached. choke/src/support/choke.spt can be tuned 
> > > to suck even more. Do 'make load' in choke/src/ and you are good 
> > > to go.
> > 
> > Ok, loaded.  Now what exactly are you doing to test it?
> 
> $ runcon choke_u:choke_r:choke_t ksh -l
> $ id
> 
> Then witness the lag.

Not seeing it.

> If you want hard numbers, use the attached script. First start 
> off in system_r:unconfined_r:unconfined_t. Run the script 
> somewhere, /tmp e.g. For proper average value computation you 
> need 'bc' installed, otherwise it's rounded but doesn't matter.

Triggers a ton of error messages in dmesg from SELinux about unmapped
security contexts?

> Then switch to choke_u:choke_r:choke_t. Run the script here. If 
> it's inconclusive, start uncommenting additional attributes in 
> choke/src/support/choke.spt.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux