Re: SELinux performance depending on type count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 19:00 +0200, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> I don't have an auditd, not running mcstransd and also had 
> disabled restorecond.
> 
> I take it, /sys/fs/selinux is equivalent to /selinux?

Yes.  /selinux moved to /sys/fs/selinux in more modern distro versions.

> /sys/fs/selinux is empty on both my Ubuntu systems.
> 
> /selinux/policyver in 26 as is the suffix of the policy file.
> 
> Complete policy is attached. choke/src/support/choke.spt can be tuned 
> to suck even more. Do 'make load' in choke/src/ and you are good 
> to go.

Ok, loaded.  Now what exactly are you doing to test it?

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux