On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 17:00 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 22:17 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote: > > +++ selinux-12092011-test/libsepol/src/Makefile 2011-09-12 21:53:56.414127000 +0200 > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ install: all > > install -m 755 $(LIBSO) $(SHLIBDIR) > > test -d $(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig || install -m 755 -d $(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig > > install -m 644 $(LIBPC) $(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig > > - cd $(LIBDIR) && ln -sf ../../`basename $(SHLIBDIR)`/$(LIBSO) $(TARGET) > > + cd $(SHLIBDIR) && ln -sf $(LIBSO) $(TARGET) > > > > relabel: > > /sbin/restorecon $(SHLIBDIR)/$(LIBSO) > > > > Is there anything else that looks odd in it ? Partial description could > > be something like this: > > > > Simply use the filename as the target instead of the full path to the > > shared libraries when creating the links in SHLIBDIR during > > installation. > > The symlink and the shared object aren't always in the same directory, > e.g. in Fedora the shared object may live in /lib or /lib64 while the > symlink may live in /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. The spec file would create the second one I suppose. Regards, Guido -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
