Re: CentOS 5 RBAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/11 07:37, Roy Badami wrote:
> 
>> I think that would work and avoid the need to modify/rebuild the
>> existing policy.
>>
>> However, be aware that the sysadm vs secadm distinction is largely
>> illusory even if you do this.  See this thread for further discussion:
>> http://marc.info/?t=105457894700002&r=1&w=2
>>
> 
> Any idea what it is that gives sysadm_t write access to selinux_config_t:file ?
> 
> I can see the rule when I opne the binary policy in apol but I haven't had much luck tracking down where it comes from in the policy source.

The auth_manage_all_files_except_shadow() call in userdom_admin_user_template().

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux