On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:32:42 +0100 Martin Orr <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon 12 Jul 13:45:28 2010, Török Edwin wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:08:12 +1000 > > Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Now given that freshclam doesn't do any serious work with the data, > >> is interpreting it going to cause any problem that we will care > >> about? If we are talking about 1 hour of CPU time vs 2 hours for > >> jit vs interpreted for run- time stuff then it makes a difference, > >> but if we are talking about 1 second vs 2 seconds for freshclam > >> then maybe there's not much point. > >> > > > > Well the purpose of loading the database with freshclam is to avoid > > causing problems to clamd. So it is important that they are either > > both JIT, or both non-JIT. > > I configured clamd not to use the JIT by putting "Bytecode false" in > clamd.conf. I put the same thing in freshclam.conf, but it > continues to try to allocate executable memory. > That sounds like a bug, please open a bugreport at bugs.clamav.net, and attach the output of strace freshclam. Best regards, --Edwin -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
