Eamon Walsh wrote:
On 02/26/2010 02:49 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 02/26/2010 01:10 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote:
On 02/25/2010 08:44 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 02/24/2010 02:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Ignore the first patch it was missing pc.in files.
I am completely new to libtool. Does this seem reasonable Eamon?
I don't see any reference to "lib64" anywhere in our Makefiles even with
the patch. We have "lib" hard-coded, and I just checked a 64-bit
machine and our stuff is in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64. Is that
what this patch is trying to solve?
Yes
If you execute
make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 SHLIBDIR=/lib64 install
It should do the right thing with the patch.
This is what the spec file hands in.
OK, that makes sense.
The patch contains a stray line involving adding -fPIC to CFLAGS. I
don't think that was meant to be part of this patch.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Eamon Walsh<ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Merged in libselinux 2.0.92
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
