On 02/26/2010 02:49 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 02/26/2010 01:10 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote: > >> On 02/25/2010 08:44 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: >> >> >>> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 02/24/2010 02:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> Ignore the first patch it was missing pc.in files. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I am completely new to libtool. Does this seem reasonable Eamon? >>> >>> >>> >> I don't see any reference to "lib64" anywhere in our Makefiles even with >> the patch. We have "lib" hard-coded, and I just checked a 64-bit >> machine and our stuff is in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64. Is that >> what this patch is trying to solve? >> >> >> >> > Yes > > If you execute > > make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 SHLIBDIR=/lib64 install > > It should do the right thing with the patch. > > This is what the spec file hands in. > OK, that makes sense. The patch contains a stray line involving adding -fPIC to CFLAGS. I don't think that was meant to be part of this patch. Otherwise, Acked-by: Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Eamon Walsh National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
