On 02/25/2010 08:44 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: > Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> On 02/24/2010 02:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> Ignore the first patch it was missing pc.in files. >> > I am completely new to libtool. Does this seem reasonable Eamon? > I don't see any reference to "lib64" anywhere in our Makefiles even with the patch. We have "lib" hard-coded, and I just checked a 64-bit machine and our stuff is in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64. Is that what this patch is trying to solve? -- Eamon Walsh National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
