Shaz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Shaz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
Shaz wrote:
Dear list,
I was studying some earlier work on RBAC and came across
Kuhn98 [1], which says that RBAC can be implemented if some
interface function is used to map privilege sets of
RBAC with
MCS. James Moris blog article on MCS [2] states that MCS is
just dicretionary like DAC if hierarchies like of MLS
levels
are not used. It might be because of the implementation of
current LSPP on Linux distros. So my question is that
can RBAC
be used with SELinux if the mapping function is provided?
Some further literature or existing work being pointed out
will be appreciated.
Thank you.
[1]
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/rbac/documents/design_implementation/kuhn-98.pdf
[2] http://james-morris.livejournal.com/5583.html
-- Shaz
Im guessing the mapping function is "newrole" right!
if then yeah you should be able too i.g.
newrole -r *_r -- -c /usr/bin/* (or wherever/whatever your
wanting to use in that role).
might get complicated with the sensitivity
levels and categories(that is if you really tweak them).
Is this consistent with NIST RBAC standard to a greater
extent? Never use roles in SELinux because thought it was just
grouping of users.
Justin P. Mattock
--
Shaz
It should be of standard to NIST(if not then they should fix that)
I don't see it as grouping users(but could be wrong),
I see it as a way of confining the situation i.g.
if you run an application in certain role, it's confined to
that role and only the privileges that role provides.
Those privileges depend on the kind of object defined by the "class"
and enforced by the object manager. I think its making sense to my
stupid mind now :) I will appreciate if someone can clear out if this
is consistent with the NIST standards.
That's fine
I'll add a CC to someone who has better knowledge than I with SELinux,
Thanks Justin.
Justin P. Mattock
--
Shaz
Stephen if you can, and have the time could you help this person out
with this question:
Is this consistent with NIST RBAC standard to a greater extent? Never
use roles in SELinux because thought it was just grouping of users.
Justin P. Mattock
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.