On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Xavier Toth <txtoth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Joe Nall <joe@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito >> <cpebenito@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I've got to the point where I am collapsing the derived types in the >>> xserver module. It would be nice to collapse all of the X server >>> domains into xserver_t, but we have xdm_xserver_t which has permissions >>> greater than user_xserver_t, staff_server_t, etc. However, just about >>> everyone runs their xserver in xdm_xserver_t due to logging in via xdm. >>> Thoughts on collapsing all of the xservers anyway? >> >> Why is the way the xserver gets launched important once it is running? >> Does that change when X is an object manager? >> >> On a related topic, what is the type enforcement strategy for window managers? >> >> joe >> >> -- >> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. >> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. >> > > You mean display managers not window managers, right? No, window managers like Metacity. joe -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
