On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Joe Nall <joe@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito > <cpebenito@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I've got to the point where I am collapsing the derived types in the >> xserver module. It would be nice to collapse all of the X server >> domains into xserver_t, but we have xdm_xserver_t which has permissions >> greater than user_xserver_t, staff_server_t, etc. However, just about >> everyone runs their xserver in xdm_xserver_t due to logging in via xdm. >> Thoughts on collapsing all of the xservers anyway? > > Why is the way the xserver gets launched important once it is running? > Does that change when X is an object manager? > > On a related topic, what is the type enforcement strategy for window managers? > > joe > > -- > This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. > If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. > You mean display managers not window managers, right? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
