Re: secadm question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 10:18 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2008 10:09:47 am Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> > So if I change my build.conf to be mls I should be up and running.
> > I'm on RHEL5 btw
> 
> Yes, setting the TYPE to "mls" should enable the secadm_r role.  If you 
> don't need the latest Reference Policy, there is a MLS policy as part 
> of RHEL5 - it's what was used for the recent (okay, maybe not that 
> recent anymore) Common Criteria LSPP evaluations.

Using the -mls policy from RHEL5 is somewhat limiting as it excludes
various parts of the policy not covered by the evaluation (e.g. little
things like X Window System support).

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux