thanks for all hints. i think i learned something. no matter if sarcastic or ironic, we all do learn. nice weekend to you. regards Tino. Am Don, 2003-05-01 um 20.38 schrieb Paulo Abrantes: > On 01 May 2003 10:25:26 -0500 > "Robert A. Thompson" <ucs_rat@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm sure with a little foot work you can have it down to a pedestal and > > then down to a home. I find clubs/bats/etc work a lot better than > > abuse@ when you can nail it down. > > > > I really hope you are just being sarcastic about that clubs/bats/etc thing :) > But about the abuse@, you are right. I think the obvious explanation is that > the ISP will definatly not cut an account of a cliente because the ISP earns > money for giving services to clients. So mostly (at least with my experience) > they will say that cannot determinate which client was (even when you give them > IP and hh:mm:ss time). They don't know you, they don't get money from you, so > hell that don't give a damn on you. > At least, this is why I think abuse doesn't work most of the times! I might > be wrong, who knows... > Maybe the clubs weren't a bad idea afterall ;) > > Regards, > Paulo > > > > P. Abrantes > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Computer Science Student @ > Instituto Superior Tecnico > (http://www.ist.utl.pt) > > This email fortune cookie: > > >From the moment I picked your book up until I > put it down I was convulsed with laughter. Some > day I intend reading it. -- Groucho Marx > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
