Re: failed dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In regard to: failed dependency, Heyman, Jerrold said (at 5:42pm on May 23,...:

[root@heymaj1-test build]# rpm -q --provides rpmA
RPMA
librpma.so
rpmA = 1.0.0.1-000000
rpmA(x86-64) = 1.0.0.1-000000
[root@heymaj1-test build]# rpm -U --test rpmB.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
               librpma.so()(64bit) is needed by rpmB.x86_64

rpmB says it needs

	librpma.so()(64bit)

rpmA does not say it provides that exact string of characters.  Instead
it provides something else,

	librpma.so

The library is installed correctly in /opt/emc/productname/lib
Does that need to be /opt/emc/productname/lib64?

The directories aren't the problem.

What version of RPM is this, and on what distribution & version are
you testing?

Tim
--
Tim Mooney                                             Tim.Mooney@xxxxxxxx
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure                  701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, Quentin Burdick Building                  701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list



[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux