On 01/07/2016 10:35 AM, Fan Yang wrote: > Hi RPM maintainers, > > > > Here I have an issue I want to ask for your help. Sorry, for the late reply. Your mail got stuck in the moderation queue... > *What happend:* > I'm now working on a linux side-by-side installation issue since rpm no > longer support to install the 32-bit and 64-bit same name packages on a > machine at the same time. I am not aware of such change. What version of rpm are you using and what distribution are you packaging for? > So I need to change the name of the 32-bit package from xxx.i386.rpm to > xxx-32bit.i386.rpm. > > For supporting the upgrade of this package, I should provide the old > package name: xxx in the spec file. > > > > *Problem:* > I've looked into the pages of rpm.org looking for whether we can specify > the version which we provided in the spec file like: > > %Provides: xxx = 16.0 > > I've done some test and it seems to work. But I can't find any offical > explanation. > So do you know the properly behaviour if I specified the provides > package version in the Provides. Yes, this is exactly how it is supposed to work (with out the "%"). Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Charles Peters _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
