Hi,
yes, that looks like it might work. I'll give it a try, see if our people can live with this.
Thanks,
Tim T.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4 April 2014 14:07, Tim T. <tim.timmerman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Just ensure the new release tag is newer/bigger than the previous one.
> Hi Thierry,
>
> thanks for your suggestion. However, won't that break yum ? We currently
> use the Release field as a sequence number.
Eg: If your current release tag is 7, just change:
Release: 7
into:
Release: 7.%clearcase_tag
Both rpm & yum will understand that 7.123foo456bar is greater than 7
(this is an alphanumeric comparaison)
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
