On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 03:23:50PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:40:32PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > neat. :) Here's a mDNSResponder.spec that I worked on for fedora/redhat > > awhile back: > > http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/mDNSResponder/ > > Annoyingly, your spec file _does_ properly have it's requirements > handled under CentOS 5.1. :/ > > I'll try to carefully blend our spec files, and I think I store > more than you do from the distribution... So - I've successfully blended the two spec files. You spec file broke things out into separate packages, mine delivers some additional files (javadoc, an additional command-line tool, etc.) If you have any personal interest in the results, let me know. What I _still_ don't get, though, is why my spec file does work under RHEL4 or CentOS 5. Nor do I know how to debug this. Someone earlier mentioned they could use my original spec to create an RPM that had the requirements properly handled, but I have no idea what environment that was done in. Does anyone have any advice on how to chase this? Or do I have to start pawing through reams of anaconda code to chase this down? -- Brian Reichert <reichert@xxxxxxxxxxx> 55 Crystal Ave. #286 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1725 USA BSD admin/developer at large _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
