John Pye skrev, on 05/21/2007 09:27 AM:
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
use %{dist} but it's defined in a macro? and about naming
packages : can i dynamically name a package regarding to the
distribution it's been built ?
I never wrote that ...
%{dist} can be defined in your .rpmmacros file, which you create in your
home directory on each separate build host. Then you add %{dist} at the
end of your 'Release:' line, and the .rpm files will end up with the
dist tag in the resulting filenames (suggest that you use %{?dist} so
that if the marco file is missing, you end up with no text added).
This advice has the ovious disadvantage that it presupposes that
*everbody* has this definition in their .rpmmacros file - even that they
have an .rpmmacros file at all. Most people don't. Most of the grown-up
spec writers I know have some method of defining %dist in their spec
files, too many to name.
--Tonni
--
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list