The value of direct inspection (was: Re: --initdb)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Johnson wrote:

No --initdb has been harmless when run against an existing rpmdb, been
that way (that I know of) since 1998.

Truly, how hard is the test:

   cd /var/lib
   tar cf rpmdb.tar.gz ./rpm
   rpm --initdb
   rpm -qa (or --verifydb or --rebuilddb or ... )

Way easier to test than it is to sort through whatever is claimed on
the internet. YMMV.

It's funny how little we as programmers perform actual experiments to get the answers we want (hmm, maybe many of us don't know about the scientific method.) Anyway, it must not be obvious to us, becuase ESR has it listed in his "Smart Questions" essay:

http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#before (see item no. 5)

-- D.

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux