Re: Re: SUG: Automatic RPM database verification and repair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 29 November 2006, at 16:31:08 (-0500),
Matthew Miller wrote:

> By your clear tone, I'm pretty sure not only do you not "gotcha" at
> all, but willfully don't want to and further discussion is futile.

Feel free to jump to any conclusion you like.  Or you can correct my
restatement of your message to show me where I erred.  Your choice.

> > If you need me, I'll be outside pouring Diet Coke into my gas tank
> > and filing a repair claim against my warranty.
> 
> What a stupid analogy.

I don't think it's stupid at all.  But since all you have to offer is
adjectives rather than a basis for your claims, I cannot refute your
statement.  I can only offer a retort of equal logical merit:

Your momma.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "If everything is coming your way, you're in the wrong lane."
                                                            -- fortune

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux