Re: Re: SUG: Automatic RPM database verification and repair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> Ah, I see.  "The RPM DB should be robust enough to withstand any and
> all manner or means of stupidity which may be applied against it."
> Gotcha.

By your clear tone, I'm pretty sure not only do you not "gotcha" at all, but
willfully don't want to and further discussion is futile.


> If you need me, I'll be outside pouring Diet Coke into my gas tank and
> filing a repair claim against my warranty.

What a stupid analogy.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux