Re: Re: SUG: Automatic RPM database verification and repair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 29 November 2006, at 16:16:45 (-0500),
seth vidal wrote:

> > yum's psychotic handling of transactions notwithstanding, of course.
> 
> It's psychotic b/c it makes lots of consecutive reads? Interesting.

There you go with your ASSumptions again.  That's going to start
chafing if you're not careful.



On Wednesday, 29 November 2006, at 16:18:20 (-0500),
Matthew Miller wrote:

> Frankly, I don't care how psychotic it may or may not be -- it
> shouldn't matter.

Ah, I see.  "The RPM DB should be robust enough to withstand any and
all manner or means of stupidity which may be applied against it."
Gotcha.

If you need me, I'll be outside pouring Diet Coke into my gas tank and
filing a repair claim against my warranty.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "If the President knowingly lies to the American people, he should
  immediately resign."                         -- Bill Clinton in 1974

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux