Re: SUG: Automatic RPM database verification and repair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





None of the above should be considered criticism, just history.

There are two needs if one wants to protect against rpmdb data loss.

The most important is saving a copy of /var/lib/rpm/Packages routinely.
All other information in an rpmdb can be regenerated from a reasonably
recent copy of Packages. And in most cases a depsolver like yum/smart/apt/poldek will reinstall the packages that have changed since the last copy of Packages
was saved.


but how can i know which version of "/var/lib/rpm/Packages" is correct and work well, if i backup a corrupted "Packages", the backup work will
be senseless, isnt it?  :-)


The other important need is to have a find-like utility to reconstruct an rpmdb using only md5 digests of installed files for those people who are not saving
a copy of Packages ;-)

73 de Jeff



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux