On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:20:43PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote: > You are misguided. OK. I thought the lock was internal to the database backend. Sorry for the noise. > Spawning a child with a "sleep N" is way way hackier than removing > the lock. Why? Waiting for the current rpm to finish before starting another is what a user does. -- lfr 0/0
Attachment:
pgpoV3TsdtQbm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
