Re: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions, Dan Hollis said...:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:
I guessed at the fact that one is an x86_64 version and the other is
an i386 version, but I haven't been able to find a programmatic way
of disambiguating this scenario. There don't seem to be flags to --query
to provide this information, and it is not returned by --info.
rpm -q --qf '%{name}.%{arch}\n' samba-common
Would be nice to have a standard extended format for -q, eg
  rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n'
rpm has popt support built in (and deeply intertwined).  You could easily
create a popt option to do exactly that.  Or you could go the shell route
and create an alias or function that does what you need.
If you write the popt alias, be sure you share it with the list.  ;-)

Well I did say 'standard' for a reason

I guess everyone just overlooks that :/

-Dan

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux