Re: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In regard to: querying for i386 versus x86_64 versions, Marcin Krzysztof...:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've noticed that on the 64-bit version of Fedora Core 4, when I query
for certain packages, they show up twice. For example, and
	rpm -q samba-common
shows that there are two copies of samba-common on the system:
	samba-common-3.0.14a
	samba-common-3.0.14a

04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel.x86_64
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
04:56 PM dogbert ~$rpm -q glibc-devel.i386
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19

I guessed at the fact that one is an x86_64 version and the other is
an i386 version, but I haven't been able to find a programmatic way
of disambiguating this scenario. There don't seem to be flags to --query
to provide this information, and it is not returned by --info.

On a related note, how do you specify architecture requirements on the
"Requires:" line? So that if I built my own version of samba, I could
specify that it requires both
	samba-common-<myversion>.x86_64.rpm
and
	samba-common-<myversion>.i386.rpm

Check the difference between

	rpm -q --provides glib-2.3.4-2.19.i686

vs.

	rpm -q --provides glib-2.3.4-2.19.x86_64

for ideas.

Tim
--
Tim Mooney                              mooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Information Technology Services         (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building              (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux