On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:20 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:18:54PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > For some reason my script is a few percent faster than repomanage, but > > > probably that can be attributed to "mine is uglier and less robust code". :) > > what ver of repomanage are you using (from what ver of yum-utils)? b/c > > earlier ones had a couple of bugs that made it slower for silly reasons. > > I'm currently testing on FC4 so it's the one in that Extras -- 0.3. But I > looked at the code in the 0.5 version and that's where i found the NOPAYLOAD > thing. 0.6 came out and it should be faster, I think. some folks pointed out a couple of silly things, iirc. it's been a while, though. -sv _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
