> Otherwise the dependency generation is entirely forward and > backward compatible with deployed versions of rpm, equivalent > to setting > %_transaction_color 0 > 10x. Still I fail to understand: Does the a/m mean that AutoProv & AutoReq ARE supported? Why are the 2 bundled in one? > > Still, I'm not sure I understand the issue. If you generate an RPM > > that says it has no dependencies (but it really does) and > you install > > it on some system that may or may not have those dependencies > > installed, are you expecting that it will work? > > > > My question too. You're right, of course. I cower in shame... The discussed package is not under my maintenance repsonsibility. Thus I was presented with this situation, and there came the questions I forwarded to the list. As I understand, the redundant dependencies are related to shared libraries never used on our system. Amit _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
