Re: Detecting version of rpm in a spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jan 10, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:

On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 11:34 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:


Don't use what you cannot write and maintain reliably.

I was hoping there was a macro in rpm already that I just wasn't seeing.


Macros aren't the right solution.

Suggests looks interesting to reduce dependency bloat if/when the
frontends support the tag.


Hint: The alternative syntax to Suggests: is Requires(hint):

The patch to ignore unknown tokens like "hint" is perhaps easier, and having Suggests: devolve to Requires: for versions of rpm that don't support "hint" is
arguably the best way to retrofit functionality.

The real problem is that Suggests: is mechanism only, only cAos (and KainX's mezzanine)
have an understanding of how to use Suggests: with discipline.

All that apt does with Suggests: is print a message, perhaps not the most intelligent
implementation.

Sorry for wasting your time.


Be that way then. I can't help you if you can't upgrade rpm. Yet More Macro Gunk is
depressing and sad.

73 de Jeff

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux