man, 29.08.2005 kl. 23.16 skrev Thomas Cameron: [...] > > error: package eventlog-0.2.3+20050116+1856-1 is not installed. Oh, but > > it is - I can see all my docs, libs and headers, so ... and using > > (single|double) quotes didn't help. > > > > The conclusion is, 'rpm -e' doesn't like/recognize the name, whilst 'rpm > > -Uvh' did. To avoid this kind of thing in future, what are the rules for > > naming rpms (or where can I find them)? > > Try this: > > rpm -e eventlog-devel eventlog > > I think that the 0.2.3+20050116+1856-1 version info is not needed. YAY :) Brilliant, thanks, Thomas. --Tonni -- mail: tonye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.billy.demon.nl _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
