On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:37:20PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > That's the point I was making: the SRPM can have different requirements > across architectures if you check it's dependencies for example for > purposes of installing build dependencies of a given SRPM. So the SRPM > can have differences based on the arch it was built on, hence the arch of > an SRPM does have *some* meaning to it. :) AFAIK you're wrong here. The src.rpm contains spec file and sources and dependencies are stored in the spec file, not in the src.rpm metadata. So the arch does *not* have a meaning... -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
