Le Sunday 29 May 2005 21:31, Jos Vos a écrit :
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:58:36PM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > No, src.rpm has the arch of the first binary package build from this
> > spec. To
>
> Not completely true: if I make the src.rpm with rpmbuild -bs, the %{arch}
> is filled with the arch that *would be* the arch of then binary rpm *if*
> I would have built that. My point was that the value of %{arch} in
> src.rpm's is in fact useless and better should be set to none.
I add a little explanation on IRC by Jeff Johnson: it allow to check on which
arch was build the src.rpm and give a clue to trace the link src => binary
(binary was really built from same src.rpm) with the COOKIE tag.
But I understand your surprise, everybody is surprised to discover the arch
tag on src.rpm.
Attachment:
pgpDLnIzvpaY6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
