Paul Nasrat wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:43 -0400, Shane Dawalt wrote:
Paul Nasrat wrote:
# rpm --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n' -q rpm-libs elfutils-libelfOn Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:17 -0400, Shane Dawalt wrote:
I am unable to update the popt and rpm* packages under "2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP x86_64". I am receiving the following message from up2date.
There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
rpm-libs 4.2.3-13 requires libelf.so.1
rpm-libs 4.2.3-13 requires libelf.so.1(ELFUTILS_1.0)
This looks like rpm-libs.i386, what type of install did you do?
rpm --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n' -q rpm-libs elfutils-libelf
package rpm-libs is not installed
elfutils-libelf-0.94-1.x86_64
OK it looks as if up2date is trying to install rpm-libs.i386, can you do
the same rpm query with just rpm rather than rpmlibs
# rpm --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n' -q rpm rpm-4.2.1-4.2.x86_64
I did a workstation install from the RHEL v.3 CDs (AMD64). I selected compatability libs which is why the i386 stuff is showing up.
The multilib -libs biarch split was in an update release. Note this
isn't an "official" RHEL support channel here - have you tried
contacting support? It looks to me like an up2date issue rather than
RPM.
No, didn't try support; I figured I was doing something stupid. (Never considered the concept of a software problem.)
Thanks.
Shane
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
