On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:43 -0400, Shane Dawalt wrote:
> Paul Nasrat wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:17 -0400, Shane Dawalt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I am unable to update the popt and rpm* packages under
> >>"2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP x86_64". I am receiving the following
> >>message from up2date.
> >>
> >>There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
> >>
> >>Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
> >>rpm-libs 4.2.3-13 requires libelf.so.1
> >>rpm-libs 4.2.3-13 requires libelf.so.1(ELFUTILS_1.0)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This looks like rpm-libs.i386, what type of install did you do?
> >
> >rpm --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n' -q rpm-libs
> >elfutils-libelf
> >
> >
>
> # rpm --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n' -q rpm-libs
> elfutils-libelf
> package rpm-libs is not installed
> elfutils-libelf-0.94-1.x86_64
OK it looks as if up2date is trying to install rpm-libs.i386, can you do
the same rpm query with just rpm rather than rpmlibs
> I did a workstation install from the RHEL v.3 CDs (AMD64). I selected
> compatability libs which is why the i386 stuff is showing up.
The multilib -libs biarch split was in an update release. Note this
isn't an "official" RHEL support channel here - have you tried
contacting support? It looks to me like an up2date issue rather than
RPM.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
