On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 11:41 +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: > his discussion is somewhat irrelevant. Even if I were > to agree that epoch is bad even in the case where there's a change in > versioning schemes, I would still think that Maximum RPM misses the > point - because it doesn't seem to recognise this (potential) use at all. Maximum RPM predates epoch. The snapshot is a work in progress, most of the serial to epoch changes were just in place rather than a complete rewrite - patches welcome. Paul _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
