On Tuesday, 01 February 2005, at 16:50:56 (+0100), Toralf Lund wrote: > Yeah, I guess this is one of the things that it might suddenly occur > to you to try, if you use the --target option - which I generally > don't; I usually build for the default architecture or set an > alternative one once and for all via BuildArch: I did too, right up until I needed to build kernel packages for i386, i686, and athlon all from the same module in the same build system. And you know what they say about Necessity.... :-) > That's what I though. What I'm wondering about, though, is if it's > possible to tell rpmbuild via the spec file to re-exec itself that > way, and also if it passes additional --define's (or their > equivalent) based on the current position in the target list, or > something. I can't find anything looking like that in %dump, > however... AFAIK, you cannot specify multiple arch's in BuildArch:, nor is there anything similar with which you can. However, you can always use %ifarch/%ifnarch to conditionally set defines in the spec file. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I will be there for you, with these five words I swear to you. When you breathe, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. I'd live and I'd die for you, steal the sun from the sky for you. Words can't say what a love can do. I'll be there for you." -- Bon Jovi _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
