On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 01:57:01PM -0500, Cameron, Thomas wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On > > Behalf Of Enrique Perez-Terron > > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:51 PM > > To: rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Improved functionality for kernel rpms? > > > > > > Would it be possible to extend rpm with an option to be used in kernel > > rpms, so that when people (mistakenly) run "rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6...", > > the old kernel rpm is not uninstalled? > > > Seems you are trying to code around a lack of common sense. > > People will only do -Uvh until it bites them, then never again... It sucks, but sometimes the School of Hard Knocks is the best way to get a lasting education. > CEPS (Cisco print) has been using 'rpm -Uvh' for years without 'knocks'. It works very well for our purposes, too. -- Robert Lehr (concatenate 'string "bozzio" "@" "the-lehrs" ".com") _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
