Re: Invalid package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In regard to: Invalid package name?, Albert Chin said (at 10:52am on May...:

Is it legal to have two packages with the same common name but a
different revision:
 foo-1.1	/opt/foo11
 foo-1.2	/opt/foo12
 foo-1.3	/opt/foo13

This shouldn't be any problem. RH systems typically have multiple packages with the same name (kernel and/or kernel-smp) but different versions (or releases) installed. As long as there are no file conflicts between the two packages, it shouldn't matter.

I've personally had no problems installing multiple versions of a package
with the same name, but I'm using an older version of RPM.  The only
area of difficulty is when you want to upgrade a particular instance
of a package.

Tim
--
Tim Mooney                              mooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Information Technology Services         (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building              (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164


_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux