On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > Is it legal to have two packages with the same common name but a > different revision: > foo-1.1 /opt/foo11 > foo-1.2 /opt/foo12 > foo-1.3 /opt/foo13 Yes, but it's annoying, as many higher-level package management tools don't cope with this perfectly. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
