>> Well, what _is_ the right thing to do, and how do I selectively erase >> a particular rpm without erasing all of them? > The right thing is not to have multiple identical rpms only > differentiated by prefix installed. If you believe this, then rpm shouldn't permit it. Since rpm permits it, it should have a way to undo it, too. I believe there is a reasonable use case for doing this. In a development shop, I'd like permit multiple developers to build and test a specific rpm simultaniously, without having to play games with either the name or the version, since all of these may have other effects on various build, install and configuration scripts. I guess I can prefix the name with a developer name and hope for the best, that's the only option which is left... -- cg _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
