On Sunday, 21 March 2004, at 07:34:22 (+0100), Tomasz K?oczko wrote: > Will be possible to build rpm without lua ? All current rpm packages > which I know can be correctly handled without feactures like lua > embeded script interpreter so IMO adding to rpm lua is IMO plain > bloating :> Refering to a scripting language specifically designed to be small and lightweight for purposes of embedding as "bloating" tends to indicate a lack of sufficient understanding and research into the subject at hand. Why is it that so many people equate "features I won't ever use" with "bloat?" If you don't like it, don't use it, but realize that others may (and do) find it useful. Perhaps because they're facing a significantly different problem than you are. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "For the life of me I cannot remember what made us think that we were wise and we'd never comprimise. For the life of me I cannot believe we'd ever die for these sins. We were merely freshman." -- The Verve Pipe, "The Freshman" _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
