On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 07:03, Jonathan Horne wrote: > Ive loaded up an FC1 box and a 9 box both with a try at reiserfs, and > so far performance is defiantly good, but I donât think im tuned > enough to know the difference. unless you run extreme tests you won't know the difference between the filesystems. Ok that is if you do a fair comparison (eg weaken EXT3 to give less protection of your data to a level that is comparable to reiserfs and JFS). By default EXT3 provides more data protection than the others, which has a measurable overhead if you put high load on the filesystem (esp a load that creates lots and lots of small new files)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
