On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:58:12AM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > It's nice to know that it works for you... Now, can you tell me what is > the parameter that's passed to the kernel to get 1040x1050 res?? > Please?? Orright, chill out! I was answering someone else's comment, no need to get antsy... OK, here are modes that I'm reasonably confident work: res: 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 8bit 769 771 773 775 15bit 784 787 790 793 16bit 785 788 791 794 24bit 786 789 792 795 I've only tried 773 (1024x768) on my Matrox G550, and it works nicely. I know the table doesn't include the resolution you want, but based on that table, I'd try these ones: 777 776 796 797 798 I'd guess that the first one is most likely to work, and going down the list to the least likely. Before you try them, bear in mind that you *might* blow up your video card or monitor. If you do, don't blame me. :-) However, if you do try them and they work, I'd like to hear about it. Remember that if you can't boot your machine and you're using grub, you can edit the parameters to the linux command, so you always have a backdoor if you're using grub (and it hasn't been secured too harshly). Good luck! :) Regards, Msquared... -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
