Re: irqbalance problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:20AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> how is this "not working" ?
> cpu 0 gets all the ethernet interrupts and cpu 1 the rest basically...
> that's about the best balance you can get!

Interesting...  I assumed that the behavior you would want would be to
divide the load equally (for any given interrupt) across CPUs.

So the system in question is acting oddly.  Processes will just
randomly pause like they are waiting for something.  The load on the
system is totally normal though, it isn't swapping, and I can't see
any unusual disk activity.  The /proc/interrupts thing was all that
seemed odd to me, but I was comparing to my desktop where I'm not
running irqbalance.  :-)

Steve
-- 
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-7360               Mobile: (618)567-7320


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux