For THIS thread, you get the whole magilla. It's a senseless thread we
can all do without. Don't you get the point? It's best to leave it off
before I post a LONG screed for a reply as a SIDE posting.
(Interspersed and trimmed posting is preferred. However, one can adapt
to other's posting styles if needed. And some answers are so short it
SAVES time to post to the top with a simple one line answer. It's QUICKER
to read the top post in that case. Beancounters, lawyers, and building
inspectors are inflexible objects. I'm none of the three. Nor do I expect
any of those would ever be really comfortable with Linux. The strait-
jacket is not tight enough.)
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, 2003 October, 05 20:46
Subject: Re: e-mail etiquette
> At 10:35 10/5/2003, you wrote:
>
> >Thank you, Mr. or Ms. Day, for this sterling example of 'netiquette.'
>
> Just to make my point further, note that you unnecessarily quoted 40 lines
> (I counted) of previous text, thus indulging in precisely that one bad
> habit which makes life dificult for the physically-challenged (you),
> temporally-challenged (me), and just plain bored (seven thousand others)
> members of this list.
>
> Please trim your replies. I'm sure you have no problem reading my posts...
> I wish I could say the same for yours. Yes, it takes a few seconds of
> effort when replying, but it sure is worth it when you save time for 7,000
> other people, right? And later when they do the same for you, right?
>
>
> --
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> --
> Shrike-list mailing list
> Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
