Re: Fedora vs. RHL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:09:18 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote
> At 23:02 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >Assume that Joe Sysmanager is used to buying a boxed set of Red Hat Linux
> >and installing it on several production servers. He does not have a
> >SLA with Red Hat and doesn't use up2date, but simply downloads security
> >patches amd bug fixes from Red Hat's web site.  What will he lose, that he
> >has now, by going with Fedora when it is available?
> 
> Other than losing the ability to purchase a boxed set from the store 
> shelf and thus contribute some money to Red Hat, I can't see that he 
> will lose anything at all. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

I am a paid subscriber to RHN for all the systems I use. The use of up2date
and automatic updates has been a real time saver. Losing this would be a
definite problem for me. That is the issue that I have not seen addressed yet?



-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux