On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:01, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > The ONLY thing that worries me is that, so far, RHEL pricing is WAAAAAAAY > beyond the reach of SOHO and small business. Indeed, as an individual I pay > for two RHN entitlements and I have arranged for corporations with which I > work to pay for another five RHN entitlements. But neither I nor the > corporations can go from $60/year to $300/year (or thereabouts) per > server... we simply cannot afford it. Is Red Hat going to forgo those > $420/year from me, or are they going to offer SOHO pricing? The only workaround to this stupid policy in which one abdicates the rights granted by the licenses on most software is to buy the CD and recompiling the SRPMS that are published on the updates site. All I wanted was the EoL of AS for downloading updates. Why won't RedHat have a pricing of say... $2499/year for an account that only grants one thing to the costumer: timely access to the updates. I don't want phone assistance, 12x5 or 24x7. Just the updates. We'd pay for that. Unfortunately, RedHat France never answered me back. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
